Propulsion10 February 2013
HTP Supply Chain Disruption: Quality Variance Issues
↦ Newsroom HTP supplier quality control issues: purity variance 85-92% H2O2. Few suppliers available, switching costly. Decision made to build in-house vacuum distillation facility for high-purity HTP production. Facility design: several liters per week capacity. Strategic investment for testing reliability and supply independence.
## Supply Chain Quality Issues
The primary HTP supplier exhibited quality control problems with wild variance in purity and concentration (85-92% H2O2). After over a year of consistent product, quality degraded significantly. Some batches were acceptable, others barely usable. Performance variations could no longer be attributed to thruster design—the propellant itself became the variable.
## Supplier Constraints
HTP is a specialty chemical with few suppliers and high cost. Switching suppliers would incur significant expense and delay. The supplier claimed manufacturing processes were unchanged, but quality variance suggested altered raw materials or purification procedures. Continuing with unreliable propellant was not viable.
## In-House Production Solution
The decision was made to build a small vacuum distillation facility to concentrate HTP to required purity and concentration. This approach would provide quality control, reduce propellant costs, and break dependence on unreliable external suppliers. Vacuum distillation is well-established: HTP has a lower boiling point than water, so under vacuum, HTP evaporates preferentially and can be condensed to high-purity product.
## Implementation
Design work began on a small-scale facility capable of producing several liters per week of high-purity HTP. The capital cost was significant but would be offset by reduced propellant costs and dramatically improved testing reliability. In-house HTP production was a strategic investment for developing a reliable thruster system.